5.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: David Wang <00107082@xxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 84b9749a3a704dcc824a88aa8267247c801d51e4 ]
seq_printf is costy, on a system with n CPUs, reading /proc/softirqs
would yield 10*n decimal values, and the extra cost parsing format string
grows linearly with number of cpus. Replace seq_printf with
seq_put_decimal_ull_width have significant performance improvement.
On an 8CPUs system, reading /proc/softirqs show ~40% performance
gain with this patch.
Signed-off-by: David Wang <00107082@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/proc/softirqs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/softirqs.c b/fs/proc/softirqs.c
index 12901dcf57e2b..d8f4e7d54d002 100644
--- a/fs/proc/softirqs.c
+++ b/fs/proc/softirqs.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ static int show_softirqs(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
for (i = 0; i < NR_SOFTIRQS; i++) {
seq_printf(p, "%12s:", softirq_to_name[i]);
for_each_possible_cpu(j)
- seq_printf(p, " %10u", kstat_softirqs_cpu(i, j));
+ seq_put_decimal_ull_width(p, " ", kstat_softirqs_cpu(i, j), 10);
seq_putc(p, '\n');
}
return 0;
--
2.43.0
