Re: [PATCH v2] mm: cma: fix CMA aligned offset calculation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 02:17:46PM -0800, Danesh Petigara wrote:
> The CMA aligned offset calculation is incorrect for
> non-zero order_per_bit values.
> 
> For example, if cma->order_per_bit=1, cma->base_pfn=
> 0x2f800000 and align_order=12, the function returns
> a value of 0x17c00 instead of 0x400.
> 
> This patch fixes the CMA aligned offset calculation.
> 
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Danesh Petigara <dpetigara@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> 	- moved comment out of function
> 	- removed unused 'alignment' variable
> 
> v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/24/598
> 

<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]