[PATCH 5.15 129/565] regmap: irq: Set lockdep class for hierarchical IRQ domains

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

5.15-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 953e549471cabc9d4980f1da2e9fa79f4c23da06 ]

Lockdep gives a false positive splat as it can't distinguish the lock
which is taken by different IRQ descriptors from different IRQ chips
that are organized in a way of a hierarchy:

   ======================================================
   WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
   6.12.0-rc5-next-20241101-00148-g9fabf8160b53 #562 Tainted: G        W
   ------------------------------------------------------
   modprobe/141 is trying to acquire lock:
   ffff899446947868 (intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc:502:(&bxtwc_regmap_config)->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: regmap_update_bits_base+0x33/0x90

   but task is already holding lock:
   ffff899446947c68 (&d->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __setup_irq+0x682/0x790

   which lock already depends on the new lock.

   -> #3 (&d->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
   -> #2 (&desc->request_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
   -> #1 (ipclock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
   -> #0 (intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc:502:(&bxtwc_regmap_config)->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:

   Chain exists of:
     intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc:502:(&bxtwc_regmap_config)->lock --> &desc->request_mutex --> &d->lock

    Possible unsafe locking scenario:

          CPU0                    CPU1
          ----                    ----
     lock(&d->lock);
                                  lock(&desc->request_mutex);
                                  lock(&d->lock);
     lock(intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc:502:(&bxtwc_regmap_config)->lock);

    *** DEADLOCK ***

   3 locks held by modprobe/141:
    #0: ffff8994419368f8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __driver_attach+0xf6/0x250
    #1: ffff89944690b250 (&desc->request_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __setup_irq+0x1a2/0x790
    #2: ffff899446947c68 (&d->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __setup_irq+0x682/0x790

Set a lockdep class when we map the IRQ so that it doesn't warn about
a lockdep bug that doesn't exist.

Fixes: 4af8be67fd99 ("regmap: Convert regmap_irq to use irq_domain")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241101165553.4055617-1-andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
index 3aac960ae30ab..e3769e70844be 100644
--- a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
+++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
@@ -587,12 +587,16 @@ static irqreturn_t regmap_irq_thread(int irq, void *d)
 		return IRQ_NONE;
 }
 
+static struct lock_class_key regmap_irq_lock_class;
+static struct lock_class_key regmap_irq_request_class;
+
 static int regmap_irq_map(struct irq_domain *h, unsigned int virq,
 			  irq_hw_number_t hw)
 {
 	struct regmap_irq_chip_data *data = h->host_data;
 
 	irq_set_chip_data(virq, data);
+	irq_set_lockdep_class(virq, &regmap_irq_lock_class, &regmap_irq_request_class);
 	irq_set_chip(virq, &data->irq_chip);
 	irq_set_nested_thread(virq, 1);
 	irq_set_parent(virq, data->irq);
-- 
2.43.0