On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 02:16:43PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On 02/17/2015 02:07 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > > It will be Brian choice eventually, but if you say that you will submit that > > approach for next cycle, and yours for stable, and that for next you'll convert > > mdelay() to msleep(), I'll stop arguing. > > How about you push a proper patchset with this alternative (and a nice > cover letter explaining the need for a threaded irq) so we can discuss > properly this new turn? I think both Maxime's change (polling a new HW bit) and Robert J's change (move to a threaded IRQ) are good. I'll take another look, but I expect I'll take Maxime's v4 for the 4.0 cycle, and Robert J's v2 for 4.1 (or will we just jump straight to 5.0? I never know). Will I see a patch to convert to msleep() and/or a jiffies timeout in the near future? Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html