6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@xxxxxxxxxx> commit 914eec5e980171bc128e7e24f7a22aa1d803570e upstream. The following INFO level message was seen: seq_file: buggy .next function ocfs2_dlm_seq_next [ocfs2] did not update position index Fix: Update *pos (so m->index) to make seq_read_iter happy though the index its self makes no sense to ocfs2_dlm_seq_next. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241119174500.9198-1-wen.gang.wang@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@xxxxxxx> Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c @@ -3110,6 +3110,7 @@ static void *ocfs2_dlm_seq_next(struct s struct ocfs2_lock_res *iter = v; struct ocfs2_lock_res *dummy = &priv->p_iter_res; + (*pos)++; spin_lock(&ocfs2_dlm_tracking_lock); iter = ocfs2_dlm_next_res(iter, priv); list_del_init(&dummy->l_debug_list);
