On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 10:02 AM Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 12.12.24 09:53, Daniel Vacek wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 9:35 AM Johannes Thumshirn > > <Johannes.Thumshirn@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On 12.12.24 09:09, Daniel Vacek wrote: > >>> Hi Johannes, > >>> > >>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 9:00 AM Johannes Thumshirn > >>> <Johannes.Thumshirn@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 12.12.24 08:54, Daniel Vacek wrote: > >>>>> While testing the encoded read feature the following crash was observed > >>>>> and it can be reliably reproduced: > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Hi Daniel, > >>>> > >>>> This suspiciously looks like '05b36b04d74a ("btrfs: fix use-after-free > >>>> in btrfs_encoded_read_endio()")'. Do you have this patch applied to your > >>>> kernel? IIRC it went upstream with 6.13-rc2. > >>> > >>> Yes, I do. This one is on top of it. The crash happens with > >>> `05b36b04d74a` applied. All the crashes were reproduced with > >>> `feffde684ac2`. > >>> > >>> Honestly, `05b36b04d74a` looks a bit suspicious to me as it really > >>> does not look to deal correctly with the issue to me. I was a bit > >>> surprised/puzzled. > >> > >> Can you elaborate why? > > > > As it only touches one of those four atomic_dec_... lines. In theory > > the issue can happen also on the two async places, IIUC. It's only a > > matter of race probability. > > > >>> Anyways, I could reproduce the crash in a matter of half an hour. With > >>> this fix the torture is surviving for 22 hours atm. > >> > >> Do you also have '3ff867828e93 ("btrfs: simplify waiting for encoded > >> read endios")'? Looking at the diff it doesn't seems so. > > > > I cannot find that one. Am I missing something? Which repo are you using? > > The for-next branch for btrfs [1], which is what ppl developing against > btrfs should use. Can you please re-test with it and if needed re-base > your patch on top of it? > > [1] https://github.com/btrfs/linux for-next I did check here and I don't really see the commit. $ git remote -v origin https://github.com/btrfs/linux.git (fetch) origin https://github.com/btrfs/linux.git (push) $ git fetch $ git show 3ff867828e93 -- fatal: bad revision '3ff867828e93' Note, I was testing v6.13-rc1. This is a fix not a feature development. --nX > Thanks, > Johannes