2024. 12. 11. 15:37 keltezéssel, Vladimir Oltean írta: > [EXTERNAL E-MAIL] Warning! This email originated outside of the organization! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 01:46:56PM +0100, Robert Hodaszi wrote: >> Commit dcfe7673787b4bfea2c213df443d312aa754757b ("net: dsa: tag_sja1105: >> absorb logic for not overwriting precise info into dsa_8021q_rcv()") >> added support to let the DSA switch driver set source_port and >> switch_id. tag_8021q's logic overrides the previously set source_port >> and switch_id only if they are marked as "invalid" (-1). sja1105 and >> vsc73xx drivers are doing that properly, but ocelot_8021q driver doesn't >> initialize those variables. That causes dsa_8021q_rcv() doesn't set >> them, and they remain unassigned. >> >> Initialize them as invalid to so dsa_8021q_rcv() can return with the >> proper values. >> >> Signed-off-by: Robert Hodaszi <robert.hodaszi@xxxxxxxx> >> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> --- > Thank you for the patch, and sorry for the breakage. I suggest the > following alternative commit message: > > The blamed commit changed the dsa_8021q_rcv() calling convention to > accept pre-populated source_port and switch_id arguments. If those are > not available, as in the case of tag_ocelot_8021q, the arguments must > be preinitialized with -1. > > Due to the bug of passing uninitialized arguments, dsa_8021q_rcv() > does not detect that it needs to populate the source_port and > switch_id, and this makes dsa_conduit_find_user() fail, and leads to > packet loss on reception. > > Fixes: dcfe7673787b ("net: dsa: tag_sja1105: absorb logic for not overwriting precise info into dsa_8021q_rcv()") > Signed-off-by: Robert Hodaszi <robert.hodaszi@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Yes, that commit message makes much more sense than mine. Unfortunately, I already sent out the new patch. I rewrite it, and send out a v2 then. Robert