zram writeback is a costly operation, because every target slot (unless ZRAM_HUGE) is decompressed before it gets written to a backing device. The writeback to a backing device uses submit_bio_wait() which may look like a rescheduling point. However, if the backing device has BD_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO bit set __submit_bio() calls directly disk->fops->submit_bio(bio) on the backing device and so when submit_bio_wait() calls blk_wait_io() the I/O is already done. On such systems we effective end up in a loop for_each (target slot) { decompress(slot) __submit_bio() disk->fops->submit_bio(bio) } Which on PREEMPT_NONE systems triggers watchdogs (since there are no explicit rescheduling points). Add cond_resched() to the zram writeback loop. Fixes: a939888ec38b ("zram: support idle/huge page writeback") Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c index 0a924fae02a4..f5fa3db6b4f8 100644 --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c @@ -884,6 +884,8 @@ static ssize_t writeback_store(struct device *dev, next: zram_slot_unlock(zram, index); release_pp_slot(zram, pps); + + cond_resched(); } if (blk_idx) -- 2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog