On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 12:00:07PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 at 11:25, Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I noticed that the implementation had this status check also before
> > 71174f362d67 ("drm/msm/dpu: move writeback's atomic_check to
> > dpu_writeback.c").
> >
> > Why did this not cause any trouble back then? Or is this not the right
> > Fixes tag?
>
> If I remember correctly, the encoder's atomic_check() is called only
> if the corresponding connector is a part of the new state, if there is
> a connected CRTC, etc, while the connector's atomic_check() is called
> both for old and new connectors.
Thanks for the explanation.
Johan
