On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 07:13:50PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > ------------------ > > Note, this is the LAST 4.19.y kernel to be released. After this one, it > > is end-of-life. It's been 6 years, everyone should have moved off of it > > by now. > > ------------------ > > Releasing 130 patches as end-of-life kernel is not good idea. There > may be regression hiding between them... It is better to have a regression for a fix then ignoring known fixes every time. You seriously would want the final 4.19.y release to be missing 100+ known fixes? That's just not ok for anyone who is waiting until the last week of this kernel to change (and I know many are, which is odd...) > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.325 release. > > There are 138 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > Build fails: > > https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/jobs/8532423815 > > CC drivers/pinctrl/uniphier/pinctrl-uniphier-pro4.o > 3895 > CC drivers/pci/of.o > 3896 > drivers/rtc/rtc-st-lpc.c: In function 'st_rtc_probe': > 3897 > drivers/rtc/rtc-st-lpc.c:233:11: error: 'IRQF_NO_AUTOEN' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'IRQ_NOAUTOEN'? > 3898 > IRQF_NO_AUTOEN, pdev->name, rtc); > 3899 > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > 3900 > IRQ_NOAUTOEN > 3901 > drivers/rtc/rtc-st-lpc.c:233:11: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > 3902 > CC drivers/pci/quirks.o > 3903 > make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:303: drivers/rtc/rtc-st-lpc.o] Error 1 > 3904 > make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:544: drivers/rtc] Error 2 > 3905 > make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > 3906 > CC drivers/pinctrl/uniphier/pinctrl-uniphier-sld8.o > 3907 > CC drivers/soc/renesas/r8a7743-sysc.o What arch is this? And can you not wrap error logs like this please? thanks, greg k-h
