[PATCH 6.12 363/826] trace/trace_event_perf: remove duplicate samples on the first tracepoint event

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



6.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Levi Yun <yeoreum.yun@xxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit afe5960dc208fe069ddaaeb0994d857b24ac19d1 ]

When a tracepoint event is created with attr.freq = 1,
'hwc->period_left' is not initialized correctly. As a result,
in the perf_swevent_overflow() function, when the first time the event occurs,
it calculates the event overflow and the perf_swevent_set_period() returns 3,
this leads to the event are recorded for three duplicate times.

Step to reproduce:
    1. Enable the tracepoint event & starting tracing
         $ echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/events/module/module_free
         $ echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/tracing_on

    2. Record with perf
         $ perf record -a --strict-freq -F 1 -e "module:module_free"

    3. Trigger module_free event.
         $ modprobe -i sunrpc
         $ modprobe -r sunrpc

Result:
     - Trace pipe result:
         $ cat trace_pipe
         modprobe-174509  [003] .....  6504.868896: module_free: sunrpc

     - perf sample:
         modprobe  174509 [003]  6504.868980: module:module_free: sunrpc
         modprobe  174509 [003]  6504.868980: module:module_free: sunrpc
         modprobe  174509 [003]  6504.868980: module:module_free: sunrpc

By setting period_left via perf_swevent_set_period() as other sw_event did,
This problem could be solved.

After patch:
     - Trace pipe result:
         $ cat trace_pipe
         modprobe 1153096 [068] 613468.867774: module:module_free: xfs

     - perf sample
         modprobe 1153096 [068] 613468.867794: module:module_free: xfs

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20240913021347.595330-1-yeoreum.yun@xxxxxxx
Fixes: bd2b5b12849a ("perf_counter: More aggressive frequency adjustment")
Signed-off-by: Levi Yun <yeoreum.yun@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
index 05e7912418126..3ff9caa4a71bb 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
@@ -352,10 +352,16 @@ void perf_uprobe_destroy(struct perf_event *p_event)
 int perf_trace_add(struct perf_event *p_event, int flags)
 {
 	struct trace_event_call *tp_event = p_event->tp_event;
+	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &p_event->hw;
 
 	if (!(flags & PERF_EF_START))
 		p_event->hw.state = PERF_HES_STOPPED;
 
+	if (is_sampling_event(p_event)) {
+		hwc->last_period = hwc->sample_period;
+		perf_swevent_set_period(p_event);
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If TRACE_REG_PERF_ADD returns false; no custom action was performed
 	 * and we need to take the default action of enqueueing our event on
-- 
2.43.0







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux