6.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@xxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 4f23fc34cc68812c68c3a3dec15e26e87565f430 ] With commit 8ec9497d3ef34 ("tools/include: Sync uapi/linux/perf.h with the kernel sources"), 'perf mem report' gives an incorrect memory access string. ... 0.02% 1 3644 L5 hit [.] 0x0000000000009b0e mlc [.] 0x00007fce43f59480 ... This occurs because, if no entry exists in mem_lvlnum, perf_mem__lvl_scnprintf will default to 'L%d, lvl', which in this case for PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_L2_MHB is 0x05. Add entries for PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_L2_MHB and PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_MSC to mem_lvlnum, so that the correct strings are printed. ... 0.02% 1 3644 L2 MHB hit [.] 0x0000000000009b0e mlc [.] 0x00007fce43f59480 ... Fixes: 8ec9497d3ef34 ("tools/include: Sync uapi/linux/perf.h with the kernel sources") Suggested-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@xxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240926144040.77897-1-thomas.falcon@xxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- tools/perf/util/mem-events.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c index 051feb93ed8d4..bf5090f5220bb 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c @@ -366,6 +366,12 @@ static const char * const mem_lvl[] = { }; static const char * const mem_lvlnum[] = { + [PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_L1] = "L1", + [PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_L2] = "L2", + [PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_L3] = "L3", + [PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_L4] = "L4", + [PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_L2_MHB] = "L2 MHB", + [PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_MSC] = "Memory-side Cache", [PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_UNC] = "Uncached", [PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_CXL] = "CXL", [PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_IO] = "I/O", @@ -448,7 +454,7 @@ int perf_mem__lvl_scnprintf(char *out, size_t sz, const struct mem_info *mem_inf if (mem_lvlnum[lvl]) l += scnprintf(out + l, sz - l, mem_lvlnum[lvl]); else - l += scnprintf(out + l, sz - l, "L%d", lvl); + l += scnprintf(out + l, sz - l, "Unknown level %d", lvl); l += scnprintf(out + l, sz - l, " %s", hit_miss); return l; -- 2.43.0