Hi! > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.119 release. > There are 73 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> > KVM: VMX: Bury Intel PT virtualization (guest/host mode) behind > CONFIG_BROKEN So... someone is passing kernel command line parameter, and setup works for him, now we start silently ignoring that parameter? That is pretty unfriendly. > Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> > NFSD: Limit the number of concurrent async COPY operations @@ -1782,10 +1783,16 @@ nfsd4_copy(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, if (nfsd4_copy_is_async(copy)) { - status = nfserrno(-ENOMEM); async_copy = kzalloc(sizeof(struct nfsd4_copy), GFP_KERNEL); if (!async_copy) goto out_err; This is wrong. Status is success from previous code, and you are now returning it in case of error. (Also, the atomic dance does not work. It will not allow desired concurency in case of races. Semaphore is canonical solution for this.) > Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > mm: revert "mm: shmem: fix data-race in shmem_getattr()" No problem with this patch, but please remember this next time you apply "no real bug but warnings are bad" change... Best regards, Pavel -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature