[patch added to the 3.12 stable tree] net: rps: fix cpu unplug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>

This patch has been added to the 3.12 stable tree. If you have any
objections, please let us know.

===============

[ Upstream commit ac64da0b83d82abe62f78b3d0e21cca31aea24fa ]

softnet_data.input_pkt_queue is protected by a spinlock that
we must hold when transferring packets from victim queue to an active
one. This is because other cpus could still be trying to enqueue packets
into victim queue.

A second problem is that when we transfert the NAPI poll_list from
victim to current cpu, we absolutely need to special case the percpu
backlog, because we do not want to add complex locking to protect
process_queue : Only owner cpu is allowed to manipulate it, unless cpu
is offline.

Based on initial patch from Prasad Sodagudi & Subash Abhinov
Kasiviswanathan.

This version is better because we do not slow down packet processing,
only make migration safer.

Reported-by: Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
---
 net/core/dev.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index ece49db4f265..249ab7d67254 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -6405,10 +6405,20 @@ static int dev_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
 		oldsd->output_queue = NULL;
 		oldsd->output_queue_tailp = &oldsd->output_queue;
 	}
-	/* Append NAPI poll list from offline CPU. */
-	if (!list_empty(&oldsd->poll_list)) {
-		list_splice_init(&oldsd->poll_list, &sd->poll_list);
-		raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ);
+	/* Append NAPI poll list from offline CPU, with one exception :
+	 * process_backlog() must be called by cpu owning percpu backlog.
+	 * We properly handle process_queue & input_pkt_queue later.
+	 */
+	while (!list_empty(&oldsd->poll_list)) {
+		struct napi_struct *napi = list_first_entry(&oldsd->poll_list,
+							    struct napi_struct,
+							    poll_list);
+
+		list_del_init(&napi->poll_list);
+		if (napi->poll == process_backlog)
+			napi->state = 0;
+		else
+			____napi_schedule(sd, napi);
 	}
 
 	raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_TX_SOFTIRQ);
@@ -6419,7 +6429,7 @@ static int dev_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
 		netif_rx(skb);
 		input_queue_head_incr(oldsd);
 	}
-	while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(&oldsd->input_pkt_queue))) {
+	while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&oldsd->input_pkt_queue))) {
 		netif_rx(skb);
 		input_queue_head_incr(oldsd);
 	}
-- 
2.2.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]