Re: [PATCH v3] x86/cpu: Add INTEL_LUNARLAKE_M to X86_BUG_MONITOR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/20/24 12:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219364
>>>
>>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 6.11
>>> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
>> This obviously conflicts with the VFM infrastructure, but shouldn't this
>> also get backported to even older stable kernels?
> As a matter of principle, it should go to all of the stable kernel
> series still in use, but it obviously needs backporting and I'm not
> really sure how attractive the old kernel series will be for LNL users
> (quite likely not at all).

I'm not going to lose sleep over it, but as a policy, I think we should
backport CPU fixes to all the stable kernels. I don't feel like I have a
good enough handle on what kernels folks run on new systems to make a
prediction.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux