[PATCH 6.1 36/73] fs/ntfs3: Additional check in ntfs_file_release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



6.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 031d6f608290c847ba6378322d0986d08d1a645a ]

Reported-by: syzbot+8c652f14a0fde76ff11d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bin Lan <bin.lan.cn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/ntfs3/file.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ntfs3/file.c b/fs/ntfs3/file.c
index aedd4f5f459e6..70b38465aee36 100644
--- a/fs/ntfs3/file.c
+++ b/fs/ntfs3/file.c
@@ -1214,8 +1214,16 @@ static int ntfs_file_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 	int err = 0;
 
 	/* If we are last writer on the inode, drop the block reservation. */
-	if (sbi->options->prealloc && ((file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE) &&
-				      atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) == 1)) {
+	if (sbi->options->prealloc &&
+	    ((file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE) &&
+	     atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) == 1)
+	   /*
+	    * The only file when inode->i_fop = &ntfs_file_operations and
+	    * init_rwsem(&ni->file.run_lock) is not called explicitly is MFT.
+	    *
+	    * Add additional check here.
+	    */
+	    && inode->i_ino != MFT_REC_MFT) {
 		ni_lock(ni);
 		down_write(&ni->file.run_lock);
 
-- 
2.43.0







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux