6.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
commit e2261bb81e0db86c3c866734cf93232a58464ecd upstream.
Duplicate opps reported by buggy SCP firmware currently show up
as warnings even though the only functional impact is that the
level/index remain inaccessible. Make it less scary for the end
user by using dev_info instead, along with FW_BUG tag.
Suggested-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <20241030125512.2884761-4-quic_sibis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ process_response_opp(struct device *dev,
ret = xa_insert(&dom->opps_by_lvl, opp->perf, opp, GFP_KERNEL);
if (ret) {
- dev_warn(dev, "Failed to add opps_by_lvl at %d for %s - ret:%d\n",
+ dev_info(dev, FW_BUG "Failed to add opps_by_lvl at %d for %s - ret:%d\n",
opp->perf, dom->info.name, ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ process_response_opp_v4(struct device *d
ret = xa_insert(&dom->opps_by_lvl, opp->perf, opp, GFP_KERNEL);
if (ret) {
- dev_warn(dev, "Failed to add opps_by_lvl at %d for %s - ret:%d\n",
+ dev_info(dev, FW_BUG "Failed to add opps_by_lvl at %d for %s - ret:%d\n",
opp->perf, dom->info.name, ret);
return ret;
}
