On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 10:02:33PM -0500, Leonard Lausen wrote: > The finding is that while 6.10.14 with this patch applied still suffers from > that regression, 6.11.9 and 6.12 do not face the CRTC state regression. > Therefore, whatever issue the patch uncovered in older kernels and which > justified not merging it before due to regressing basic CTM functionality, is > now fixed. The patch should be good to merge and backport to 6.11, but from my > perspective should not be backported to older kernels unless the interaction > with the DRM CRTC state issue is understood and an associated fix backported as > well. Thanks for testing. The 6.9 and 6.10 stable trees are EOL and backporting to 6.11 should not cause any trouble then. Johan
