On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 6:45 PM Francesco Dolcini <francesco@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 10:22:13AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 09:39:40AM +0100, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 05:02:01PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 03:56:44PM +0100, Parth Pancholi wrote: > > > > > From: Parth Pancholi <parth.pancholi@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > Replace lz4c with lz4 for kernel image compression. > > > > > Although lz4 and lz4c are functionally similar, lz4c has been deprecated > > > > > upstream since 2018. Since as early as Ubuntu 16.04 and Fedora 25, lz4 > > > > > and lz4c have been packaged together, making it safe to update the > > > > > requirement from lz4c to lz4. > > > > > > > > > > Consequently, some distributions and build systems, such as OpenEmbedded, > > > > > have fully transitioned to using lz4. OpenEmbedded core adopted this > > > > > change in commit fe167e082cbd ("bitbake.conf: require lz4 instead of > > > > > lz4c"), causing compatibility issues when building the mainline kernel > > > > > in the latest OpenEmbedded environment, as seen in the errors below. > > > > > > > > > > This change also updates the LZ4 compression commands to make it backward > > > > > compatible by replacing stdin and stdout with the '-' option, due to some > > > > > unclear reason, the stdout keyword does not work for lz4 and '-' works for > > > > > both. In addition, this modifies the legacy '-c1' with '-9' which is also > > > > > compatible with both. This fixes the mainline kernel build failures with > > > > > the latest master OpenEmbedded builds associated with the mentioned > > > > > compatibility issues. > > > > > > > > > > LZ4 arch/arm/boot/compressed/piggy_data > > > > > /bin/sh: 1: lz4c: not found > > > > > ... > > > > > ... > > > > > ERROR: oe_runmake failed > > > > > > > > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > What bug does this resolve that it needs to be backported to stable > > > > kernels? > > > > > > This is not solving any existing actual bug, and therefore there is no > > > fixes tag. > > > > > > The issue here is that the kernel build system is using lz4c, that is > > > deprecated since 2018, and now distributions are actively moving away from it. > > > > > > openSUSE Tumbleweed and OE already removed it, so you would not be able > > > to compile a stable kernel on such distribution when using lz4 unless we > > > backport such a patch. > > > > > > Everything should be properly documented in the commit message already. > > > > > > My understanding is that something like that would be a reason for > > > backporting to stable, if my understanding is not correct we'll remove > > > the cc:stable and send a v3. > > > > Please read: > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html > > for what meets stable kernel requirements. I don't think that this > > patch is that. > > Greg, ack. > > Masahiro, can you please let me know if we should send a v3 with the stable > tag removed or you can remove it yourself when applying? > I applied this with the stable tag removed. Thanks. (I guess someone may want to backport this eventually, as such distros cannot build stable kernels with ld4 compression.) -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada