5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Zichen Xie <zichenxie0106@xxxxxxxxx>
commit 5a4510c762fc04c74cff264cd4d9e9f5bf364bae upstream.
This was found by a static analyzer.
There may be a potential integer overflow issue in
unstripe_ctr(). uc->unstripe_offset and uc->unstripe_width are
defined as "sector_t"(uint64_t), while uc->unstripe,
uc->chunk_size and uc->stripes are all defined as "uint32_t".
The result of the calculation will be limited to "uint32_t"
without correct casting.
So, we recommend adding an extra cast to prevent potential
integer overflow.
Fixes: 18a5bf270532 ("dm: add unstriped target")
Signed-off-by: Zichen Xie <zichenxie0106@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/md/dm-unstripe.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/md/dm-unstripe.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-unstripe.c
@@ -84,8 +84,8 @@ static int unstripe_ctr(struct dm_target
}
uc->physical_start = start;
- uc->unstripe_offset = uc->unstripe * uc->chunk_size;
- uc->unstripe_width = (uc->stripes - 1) * uc->chunk_size;
+ uc->unstripe_offset = (sector_t)uc->unstripe * uc->chunk_size;
+ uc->unstripe_width = (sector_t)(uc->stripes - 1) * uc->chunk_size;
uc->chunk_shift = is_power_of_2(uc->chunk_size) ? fls(uc->chunk_size) - 1 : 0;
tmp_len = ti->len;
