Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/cpu: Add INTEL_LUNARLAKE_M to X86_BUG_MONITOR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 2:12 PM Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 6:44 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > -       if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MWAIT) && c->x86_vfm == INTEL_ATOM_GOLDMONT)
> > > +       if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MWAIT) &&
> > > +           (c->x86_vfm == INTEL_ATOM_GOLDMONT
> > > +            || c->x86_vfm == INTEL_LUNARLAKE_M))
> >
> > I would put the || at the end of the previous line, that is
>
>
> It isn't my personal preference for human readability either,
> but this is what scripts/Lindent does...

Well, it doesn't match the coding style of the first line ...





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux