The patch titled
Subject: ocfs2: fix UBSAN warning in ocfs2_verify_volume()
has been added to the -mm mm-hotfixes-unstable branch. Its filename is
ocfs2-fix-ubsan-warning-in-ocfs2_verify_volume.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/ocfs2-fix-ubsan-warning-in-ocfs2_verify_volume.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: ocfs2: fix UBSAN warning in ocfs2_verify_volume()
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 12:21:00 +0300
Syzbot has reported the following splat triggered by UBSAN:
UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/ocfs2/super.c:2336:10
shift exponent 32768 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 5255 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.12.0-rc4-syzkaller-00047-gc2ee9f594da8 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360
? __pfx_dump_stack_lvl+0x10/0x10
? __pfx__printk+0x10/0x10
? __asan_memset+0x23/0x50
? lockdep_init_map_type+0xa1/0x910
__ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x3c8/0x420
ocfs2_fill_super+0xf9c/0x5750
? __pfx_ocfs2_fill_super+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_validate_chain+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_validate_chain+0x10/0x10
? validate_chain+0x11e/0x5920
? __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050
? __pfx_validate_chain+0x10/0x10
? string+0x26a/0x2b0
? widen_string+0x3a/0x310
? string+0x26a/0x2b0
? bdev_name+0x2b1/0x3c0
? pointer+0x703/0x1210
? __pfx_pointer+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_format_decode+0x10/0x10
? __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050
? vsnprintf+0x1ccd/0x1da0
? snprintf+0xda/0x120
? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
? do_raw_spin_lock+0x14f/0x370
? __pfx_snprintf+0x10/0x10
? set_blocksize+0x1f9/0x360
? sb_set_blocksize+0x98/0xf0
? setup_bdev_super+0x4e6/0x5d0
mount_bdev+0x20c/0x2d0
? __pfx_ocfs2_fill_super+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_mount_bdev+0x10/0x10
? vfs_parse_fs_string+0x190/0x230
? __pfx_vfs_parse_fs_string+0x10/0x10
legacy_get_tree+0xf0/0x190
? __pfx_ocfs2_mount+0x10/0x10
vfs_get_tree+0x92/0x2b0
do_new_mount+0x2be/0xb40
? __pfx_do_new_mount+0x10/0x10
__se_sys_mount+0x2d6/0x3c0
? __pfx___se_sys_mount+0x10/0x10
? do_syscall_64+0x100/0x230
? __x64_sys_mount+0x20/0xc0
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f37cae96fda
Code: 48 8b 0d 51 ce 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 49 89 ca b8 a5 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 1e ce 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fff6c1aa228 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fff6c1aa240 RCX: 00007f37cae96fda
RDX: 00000000200002c0 RSI: 0000000020000040 RDI: 00007fff6c1aa240
RBP: 0000000000000004 R08: 00007fff6c1aa280 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 00000000000008c0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 00000000000008c0
R13: 00007fff6c1aa280 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: 0000000001000000
</TASK>
For a really damaged superblock, the value of 'i_super.s_blocksize_bits'
may exceed the maximum possible shift for an underlying 'int'. So add an
extra check whether the aforementioned field represents the valid block
size, which is 512 bytes, 1K, 2K, or 4K.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241106092100.2661330-1-dmantipov@xxxxxxxxx
Fixes: ccd979bdbce9 ("[PATCH] OCFS2: The Second Oracle Cluster Filesystem")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@xxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: syzbot+56f7cd1abe4b8e475180@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=56f7cd1abe4b8e475180
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ocfs2/super.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ocfs2/super.c~ocfs2-fix-ubsan-warning-in-ocfs2_verify_volume
+++ a/fs/ocfs2/super.c
@@ -2319,6 +2319,7 @@ static int ocfs2_verify_volume(struct oc
struct ocfs2_blockcheck_stats *stats)
{
int status = -EAGAIN;
+ u32 blksz_bits;
if (memcmp(di->i_signature, OCFS2_SUPER_BLOCK_SIGNATURE,
strlen(OCFS2_SUPER_BLOCK_SIGNATURE)) == 0) {
@@ -2333,11 +2334,15 @@ static int ocfs2_verify_volume(struct oc
goto out;
}
status = -EINVAL;
- if ((1 << le32_to_cpu(di->id2.i_super.s_blocksize_bits)) != blksz) {
+ /* Acceptable block sizes are 512 bytes, 1K, 2K and 4K. */
+ blksz_bits = le32_to_cpu(di->id2.i_super.s_blocksize_bits);
+ if (blksz_bits < 9 || blksz_bits > 12) {
mlog(ML_ERROR, "found superblock with incorrect block "
- "size: found %u, should be %u\n",
- 1 << le32_to_cpu(di->id2.i_super.s_blocksize_bits),
- blksz);
+ "size bits: found %u, should be 9, 10, 11, or 12\n",
+ blksz_bits);
+ } else if ((1 << le32_to_cpu(blksz_bits)) != blksz) {
+ mlog(ML_ERROR, "found superblock with incorrect block "
+ "size: found %u, should be %u\n", 1 << blksz_bits, blksz);
} else if (le16_to_cpu(di->id2.i_super.s_major_rev_level) !=
OCFS2_MAJOR_REV_LEVEL ||
le16_to_cpu(di->id2.i_super.s_minor_rev_level) !=
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from dmantipov@xxxxxxxxx are
ocfs2-fix-ubsan-warning-in-ocfs2_verify_volume.patch
ocfs2-fix-uninitialized-value-in-ocfs2_file_read_iter.patch
