On 11/5/24 7:50 PM, Matt Muggeridge wrote: > I'm a little surprised by this consideration. If we account for poorly > written buggy user-programs, doesn't this open any API to an explosion > of new attributes or other odd extensions? I'd imagine the same argument yes, it does and there are many examples. UAPIs are hard to get right yet persistent forever, so I do agree with Ido's push back on making sure it is needed.
