On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 11:38:59AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > > > An alternative would be to move this part into the read/write_buf > > > functions, but that's a lot of work... > > > > > > > Yeah, indeed. This also has other benefits. As we discussed on IRC, it > > would allow to support raw writes (i.e. ECC off). > > OK. This is probably a good work item for later. But let's get back on > point. > > I'd like to see version 2 with the following: > > 1. For sure the jiffies loop needs to be rewritten > > 2. Optionally, the RDDREQ bit should be checked less often, per the > datasheet and Boris's comments > > Maxime, would that be OK? Yep. I actually worked on these two issues just today. It looks like I blew my boards' bootloader in the process, so it might take so time. > Then maybe I can get this into 3.20. Maybe not in my primary -rc1 > pullreq, if we haven't had enough time to look at and test v2, but ASAP. > Only after than am I likely to take Rob's ARM64 cleanup. Sounds good, thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature