5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 98647df0178df215b8239c5c365537283b2852a6 ]
When the HWRM command fails, driver currently returns -EFAULT(Bad
address). This does not look correct.
Modified to return -EIO(I/O error).
Fixes: cc1ec769b87c ("RDMA/bnxt_re: Fixing the Control path command and response handling")
Fixes: 65288a22ddd8 ("RDMA/bnxt_re: use shadow qd while posting non blocking rcfw command")
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/r/1728373302-19530-5-git-send-email-selvin.xavier@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_rcfw.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_rcfw.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_rcfw.c
index 2b0c3a86293cf..148f2c51a9460 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_rcfw.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_rcfw.c
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ int bnxt_qplib_rcfw_send_message(struct bnxt_qplib_rcfw *rcfw,
/* failed with status */
dev_err(&rcfw->pdev->dev, "cmdq[%#x]=%#x status %#x\n",
cookie, opcode, evnt->status);
- rc = -EFAULT;
+ rc = -EIO;
}
return rc;
--
2.43.0
