[PATCH 6.6 v2] SUNRPC: Remove BUG_ON call sites

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 789ce196a31dd13276076762204bee87df893e53 ]

There is no need to take down the whole system for these assertions.

I'd rather not attempt a heroic save here, as some bug has occurred
that has left the transport data structures in an unknown state.
Just warn and then leak the left-over resources.

Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: resend with signoff properly set as requested
v1: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241102065203.13291-1-asmadeus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

 net/sunrpc/svc.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc.c b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
index 029c49065016..b43dc8409b1f 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svc.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
@@ -577,11 +577,12 @@ svc_destroy(struct kref *ref)
 	timer_shutdown_sync(&serv->sv_temptimer);
 
 	/*
-	 * The last user is gone and thus all sockets have to be destroyed to
-	 * the point. Check this.
+	 * Remaining transports at this point are not expected.
 	 */
-	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&serv->sv_permsocks));
-	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&serv->sv_tempsocks));
+	WARN_ONCE(!list_empty(&serv->sv_permsocks),
+		  "SVC: permsocks remain for %s\n", serv->sv_program->pg_name);
+	WARN_ONCE(!list_empty(&serv->sv_tempsocks),
+		  "SVC: tempsocks remain for %s\n", serv->sv_program->pg_name);
 
 	cache_clean_deferred(serv);
 
-- 
2.46.1





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux