On 11/04, Roman Gushchin wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 05:50:49PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > But it seems that the change in inc_rlimit_get_ucounts() can be > > a bit simpler and more readable, see below. > > Eric suggested the same approach earlier in this thread. Ah, good, I didn't know ;) > I personally > don't have a strong preference here or actually I slightly prefer my > own version because this comparison to LONG_MAX looks confusing to me. > But if you have a strong preference, I'm happy to send out v2. Please, > let me know. Well, I won't insist. To me the change proposed by Eric and me looks much more readable, but of course this is subjective. But you know, you can safely ignore me. Alexey and Eric understand this code much better, so I leave this to you/Alexey/Eric. Oleg.
