On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 11:35:48PM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote: > On 2024/10/29 21:43, Johan Hovold wrote: > > And you could consider dropping the function altogether as well. > > Remove the API devm_of_phy_provider_unregister()? > > i prefer fixing it instead of removing it based on below considerations. > > 1) it is simper. just about one line change. > 2) the API may be used in future. the similar API of [PATCH 1/6] have 2 > usages. We typically don't carry APIs that no one uses (or has ever used), but sure, that can be done separately later if anyone cares. Johan
