On 2024/10/29 21:45, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 10:39:28PM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
>> From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> For devm_phy_destroy(), its comment says it needs to invoke phy_destroy()
>> to destroy the phy, but it does not invoke the function actually since
>> devres_destroy() will not call devm_phy_consume() at all which will call
>> the function, and the missing phy_destroy() call will case that the phy
>> fails to be destroyed.
>
> Here too, split in at least two sentences.
>
okay.
>> Fixed by using devres_release() instead of devres_destroy() within the API.
>
> And add a comment about there not being any in-tree users of the
> interface.
>
okay, will do it within v2.
> And consider dropping it.
okay, will follow the same action as [PATCH 2/6]
>
>> Fixes: ff764963479a ("drivers: phy: add generic PHY framework")
>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Johan
