6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 0ee288e69d033850bc87abe0f9cc3ada24763d7f ]
Peter reported that perf_event_detach_bpf_prog might skip to release
the bpf program for -ENOENT error from bpf_prog_array_copy.
This can't happen because bpf program is stored in perf event and is
detached and released only when perf event is freed.
Let's drop the -ENOENT check and make sure the bpf program is released
in any case.
Fixes: 170a7e3ea070 ("bpf: bpf_prog_array_copy() should return -ENOENT if exclude_prog not found")
Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241023200352.3488610-1-jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241022111638.GC16066@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index ecc86a595b754..9064f75de7e46 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -2217,8 +2217,6 @@ void perf_event_detach_bpf_prog(struct perf_event *event)
old_array = bpf_event_rcu_dereference(event->tp_event->prog_array);
ret = bpf_prog_array_copy(old_array, event->prog, NULL, 0, &new_array);
- if (ret == -ENOENT)
- goto unlock;
if (ret < 0) {
bpf_prog_array_delete_safe(old_array, event->prog);
} else {
--
2.43.0
