5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 223e7fb979fa06934f1595b6ad0ae1d4ead1147f ]
Also initialize regs->psw.mask in perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs().
This way user_mode(regs) will return false, like it should.
It looks like all current users initialize regs to zero, so that this
doesn't fix a bug currently. However it is better to not rely on callers
to do this.
Fixes: 914d52e46490 ("s390: implement perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs")
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/perf_event.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/perf_event.h
index b9da71632827f..ea340b9018398 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ struct perf_sf_sde_regs {
#define SAMPLE_FREQ_MODE(hwc) (SAMPL_FLAGS(hwc) & PERF_CPUM_SF_FREQ_MODE)
#define perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs(regs, __ip) do { \
+ (regs)->psw.mask = 0; \
(regs)->psw.addr = (__ip); \
(regs)->gprs[15] = (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0) - \
offsetof(struct stack_frame, back_chain); \
--
2.43.0
