[PATCH 3.10 19/51] ARM: mm: correct pte_same behaviour for LPAE.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Steve Capper <steve.capper@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit dde1b65110353517816bcbc58539463396202244 upstream.

For 3 levels of paging the PTE_EXT_NG bit will be set for user
address ptes that are written to a page table but not for ptes
created with mk_pte.

This can cause some comparison tests made by pte_same to fail
spuriously and lead to other problems.

To correct this behaviour, we mask off PTE_EXT_NG for any pte that
is present before running the comparison.

Signed-off-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Hou Pengyang <houpengyang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h |   17 +++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
@@ -166,6 +166,23 @@ static inline pmd_t *pmd_offset(pud_t *p
 		clean_pmd_entry(pmdp);	\
 	} while (0)
 
+/*
+ * For 3 levels of paging the PTE_EXT_NG bit will be set for user address ptes
+ * that are written to a page table but not for ptes created with mk_pte.
+ *
+ * In hugetlb_no_page, a new huge pte (new_pte) is generated and passed to
+ * hugetlb_cow, where it is compared with an entry in a page table.
+ * This comparison test fails erroneously leading ultimately to a memory leak.
+ *
+ * To correct this behaviour, we mask off PTE_EXT_NG for any pte that is
+ * present before running the comparison.
+ */
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SAME
+#define pte_same(pte_a,pte_b)	((pte_present(pte_a) ? pte_val(pte_a) & ~PTE_EXT_NG	\
+					: pte_val(pte_a))				\
+				== (pte_present(pte_b) ? pte_val(pte_b) & ~PTE_EXT_NG	\
+					: pte_val(pte_b)))
+
 #define set_pte_ext(ptep,pte,ext) cpu_set_pte_ext(ptep,__pte(pte_val(pte)|(ext)))
 
 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]