On Wed Oct 23, 2024 at 8:46 PM EEST, Stefan Berger wrote: > > > On 10/21/24 1:39 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > tpm2_sessions_init() does not ignore the result of > > tpm2_create_null_primary(). Address this by returning -ENODEV to the > > caller. Given that upper layers cannot help healing the situation > > It looks like returning -ENODEV applied to a previous version of the patch. > > > further, deal with the TPM error here by > > This sounds like an incomplete sentence... It looks like totally corrupted, thanks for the remark. "tpm2_sessions_init() ignores the return value of tpm2_create_null_primary(). Fail early and return back to the caller if it fails. Fine-tune the error message while at it." Is this sufficient? BR, Jarkko
