On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 12:25:26PM +0200, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote: > Enabling CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST with its dependence CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT > creates this splat when an MPTCP socket is created: > > ============================= > WARNING: suspicious RCU usage > 6.12.0-rc2+ #11 Not tainted > ----------------------------- > net/mptcp/sched.c:44 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! > > other info that might help us debug this: > > rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 > no locks held by mptcp_connect/176. > > stack backtrace: > CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 176 Comm: mptcp_connect Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2+ #11 > Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 > Call Trace: > <TASK> > dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123) > lockdep_rcu_suspicious (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6822) > mptcp_sched_find (net/mptcp/sched.c:44 (discriminator 7)) > mptcp_init_sock (net/mptcp/protocol.c:2867 (discriminator 1)) > ? sock_init_data_uid (arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:28) > inet_create.part.0.constprop.0 (net/ipv4/af_inet.c:386) > ? __sock_create (include/linux/rcupdate.h:347 (discriminator 1)) > __sock_create (net/socket.c:1576) > __sys_socket (net/socket.c:1671) > ? __pfx___sys_socket (net/socket.c:1712) > ? do_user_addr_fault (arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1419 (discriminator 1)) > __x64_sys_socket (net/socket.c:1728) > do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 (discriminator 1)) > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130) > > That's because when the socket is initialised, rcu_read_lock() is not > used despite the explicit comment written above the declaration of > mptcp_sched_find() in sched.c. Adding the missing lock/unlock avoids the > warning. > > Fixes: 1730b2b2c5a5 ("mptcp: add sched in mptcp_sock") > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/523 > Reviewed-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>