5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 68a16708d2503b6303d67abd43801e2ca40c208d ]
In the s3c64xx_flush_fifo() code, the loops counter is post-decremented
in the do { } while(test && loops--) condition. This means the loops is
left at the unsigned equivalent of -1 if the loop times out. The test
after will never pass as if tests for loops == 0.
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 230d42d422e7 ("spi: Add s3c64xx SPI Controller driver")
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240924134009.116247-2-ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
index d435df1b715bb..7beea6f930933 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static void s3c64xx_flush_fifo(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd)
loops = msecs_to_loops(1);
do {
val = readl(regs + S3C64XX_SPI_STATUS);
- } while (TX_FIFO_LVL(val, sdd) && loops--);
+ } while (TX_FIFO_LVL(val, sdd) && --loops);
if (loops == 0)
dev_warn(&sdd->pdev->dev, "Timed out flushing TX FIFO\n");
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static void s3c64xx_flush_fifo(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd)
readl(regs + S3C64XX_SPI_RX_DATA);
else
break;
- } while (loops--);
+ } while (--loops);
if (loops == 0)
dev_warn(&sdd->pdev->dev, "Timed out flushing RX FIFO\n");
--
2.43.0
