[PATCH 5.15 580/691] ext4: fix inode tree inconsistency caused by ENOMEM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



5.15-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: zhanchengbin <zhanchengbin1@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 3f5424790d4377839093b68c12b130077a4e4510 upstream.

If ENOMEM fails when the extent is splitting, we need to restore the length
of the split extent.
In the ext4_split_extent_at function, only in ext4_ext_create_new_leaf will
it alloc memory and change the shape of the extent tree,even if an ENOMEM
is returned at this time, the extent tree is still self-consistent, Just
restore the split extent lens in the function ext4_split_extent_at.

ext4_split_extent_at
 ext4_ext_insert_extent
  ext4_ext_create_new_leaf
   1)ext4_ext_split
     ext4_find_extent
   2)ext4_ext_grow_indepth
     ext4_find_extent

Signed-off-by: zhanchengbin <zhanchengbin1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230103022812.130603-1-zhanchengbin1@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Baokun Li <libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/ext4/extents.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -3232,7 +3232,7 @@ static int ext4_split_extent_at(handle_t
 		ext4_ext_mark_unwritten(ex2);
 
 	err = ext4_ext_insert_extent(handle, inode, ppath, &newex, flags);
-	if (err != -ENOSPC && err != -EDQUOT)
+	if (err != -ENOSPC && err != -EDQUOT && err != -ENOMEM)
 		goto out;
 
 	/*






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux