5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 94b0818fa63555a65f6ba107080659ea6bcca63e ]
syzbot reported a warning in bcm_release(). [0]
The blamed change fixed another warning that is triggered when
connect() is issued again for a socket whose connect()ed device has
been unregistered.
However, if the socket is just close()d without the 2nd connect(), the
remaining bo->bcm_proc_read triggers unnecessary remove_proc_entry()
in bcm_release().
Let's clear bo->bcm_proc_read after remove_proc_entry() in bcm_notify().
[0]
name '4986'
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5234 at fs/proc/generic.c:711 remove_proc_entry+0x2e7/0x5d0 fs/proc/generic.c:711
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5234 Comm: syz-executor606 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc5-syzkaller-00178-g5517ae241919 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024
RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x2e7/0x5d0 fs/proc/generic.c:711
Code: ff eb 05 e8 cb 1e 5e ff 48 8b 5c 24 10 48 c7 c7 e0 f7 aa 8e e8 2a 38 8e 09 90 48 c7 c7 60 3a 1b 8c 48 89 de e8 da 42 20 ff 90 <0f> 0b 90 90 48 8b 44 24 18 48 c7 44 24 40 0e 36 e0 45 49 c7 04 07
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000345fa20 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 2a2d0aee2eb64600 RBX: ffff888032f1f548 RCX: ffff888029431e00
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffffc9000345fb08 R08: ffffffff8155b2f2 R09: 1ffff1101710519a
R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed101710519b R12: ffff888011d38640
R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b8800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007fcfb52722f0 CR3: 000000000e734000 CR4: 00000000003506f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
bcm_release+0x250/0x880 net/can/bcm.c:1578
__sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline]
sock_close+0xbc/0x240 net/socket.c:1421
__fput+0x24a/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:422
task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:228
exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:40 [inline]
do_exit+0xa2f/0x27f0 kernel/exit.c:882
do_group_exit+0x207/0x2c0 kernel/exit.c:1031
__do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1042 [inline]
__se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1040 [inline]
__x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1040
x64_sys_call+0x2634/0x2640 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:232
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7fcfb51ee969
Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7fcfb51ee93f.
RSP: 002b:00007ffce0109ca8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007fcfb51ee969
RDX: 000000000000003c RSI: 00000000000000e7 RDI: 0000000000000001
RBP: 00007fcfb526f3b0 R08: ffffffffffffffb8 R09: 0000555500000000
R10: 0000555500000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fcfb526f3b0
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007fcfb5271ee0 R15: 00007fcfb51bf160
</TASK>
Fixes: 76fe372ccb81 ("can: bcm: Remove proc entry when dev is unregistered.")
Reported-by: syzbot+0532ac7a06fb1a03187e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=0532ac7a06fb1a03187e
Tested-by: syzbot+0532ac7a06fb1a03187e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240905012237.79683-1-kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/can/bcm.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c
index 8c039638b196b..5a8bcfe9e3f02 100644
--- a/net/can/bcm.c
+++ b/net/can/bcm.c
@@ -1424,8 +1424,10 @@ static void bcm_notify(struct bcm_sock *bo, unsigned long msg,
/* remove device reference, if this is our bound device */
if (bo->bound && bo->ifindex == dev->ifindex) {
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROC_FS)
- if (sock_net(sk)->can.bcmproc_dir && bo->bcm_proc_read)
+ if (sock_net(sk)->can.bcmproc_dir && bo->bcm_proc_read) {
remove_proc_entry(bo->procname, sock_net(sk)->can.bcmproc_dir);
+ bo->bcm_proc_read = NULL;
+ }
#endif
bo->bound = 0;
bo->ifindex = 0;
--
2.43.0
