On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 11:46:45AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 10:51:31AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > On 15. 10. 24, 9:18, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > > On 15. 10. 24, 9:05, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > > On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 at 19:55, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > Reverting of this makes it work again: > > > commit 51ab63c4cc8fbcfee58b8342a35006b45afbbd0d > > > Refs: v6.11.3-19-g51ab63c4cc8f > > > Author: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > AuthorDate: Wed Sep 4 11:39:27 2024 +0200 > > > Commit: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > CommitDate: Mon Oct 14 16:10:09 2024 +0200 > > > > > > s390/boot: Compile all files with the same march flag > > > > > > [ Upstream commit fccb175bc89a0d37e3ff513bb6bf1f73b3a48950 ] > > > > > > > > > If the above is to be really used in stable (REASONS?), I believe at > > > least these are missing: > > > ebcc369f1891 s390: Use MARCH_HAS_*_FEATURES defines > > > 697b37371f4a s390: Provide MARCH_HAS_*_FEATURES defines > > > > And this one: > > db545f538747 s390/boot: Increase minimum architecture to z10 > > All of this is not supposed to be stable material. > Agreed, I'm dropping this compile s390 patch, thanks for the build testing everyone! Something went wrong with the testing on our end, odd... thanks, greg k-h