6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@xxxxxxx> commit 5c14e51d2d7df49fe0d4e64a12c58d2542f452ff upstream. Accessing device registers seems to be not reliable, the chip revision is sometimes detected wrongly (0 instead of expected 1). Ensure that the chip reset is performed via reset GPIO and then wait for 'Device Ready' status in HW_CFG register before doing any register initializations. Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fixes: a1292595e006 ("net: dsa: add new DSA switch driver for the SMSC-LAN9303") Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@xxxxxxx> [alex: reworked using read_poll_timeout()] Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@xxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@xxxxxxxxx> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241004113655.3436296-1-alexander.sverdlin@xxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) --- a/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> #include <linux/regmap.h> +#include <linux/iopoll.h> #include <linux/mutex.h> #include <linux/mii.h> #include <linux/phy.h> @@ -825,6 +826,8 @@ static void lan9303_handle_reset(struct if (!chip->reset_gpio) return; + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(chip->reset_gpio, 1); + if (chip->reset_duration != 0) msleep(chip->reset_duration); @@ -850,8 +853,34 @@ static int lan9303_disable_processing(st static int lan9303_check_device(struct lan9303 *chip) { int ret; + int err; u32 reg; + /* In I2C-managed configurations this polling loop will clash with + * switch's reading of EEPROM right after reset and this behaviour is + * not configurable. While lan9303_read() already has quite long retry + * timeout, seems not all cases are being detected as arbitration error. + * + * According to datasheet, EEPROM loader has 30ms timeout (in case of + * missing EEPROM). + * + * Loading of the largest supported EEPROM is expected to take at least + * 5.9s. + */ + err = read_poll_timeout(lan9303_read, ret, + !ret && reg & LAN9303_HW_CFG_READY, + 20000, 6000000, false, + chip->regmap, LAN9303_HW_CFG, ®); + if (ret) { + dev_err(chip->dev, "failed to read HW_CFG reg: %pe\n", + ERR_PTR(ret)); + return ret; + } + if (err) { + dev_err(chip->dev, "HW_CFG not ready: 0x%08x\n", reg); + return err; + } + ret = lan9303_read(chip->regmap, LAN9303_CHIP_REV, ®); if (ret) { dev_err(chip->dev, "failed to read chip revision register: %d\n",