Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] lockdep: fix deadlock issue between lockdep and rcu" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 05:05:19PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 06:29:21PM +0000, Carlos Llamas wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 12:07:26PM +0200, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > 
> > > The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
> > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> > > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
> > > 
> > > To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
> > > 
> > > git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y
> > > git checkout FETCH_HEAD
> > > git cherry-pick -x a6f88ac32c6e63e69c595bfae220d8641704c9b7
> > > # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
> > > git commit -s
> > > git send-email --to '<stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>' --in-reply-to '2024100226-unselfish-triangle-e5eb@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^..
> > > 
> > > Possible dependencies:
> > > 
> > > a6f88ac32c6e ("lockdep: fix deadlock issue between lockdep and rcu")
> > > 61cc4534b655 ("locking/lockdep: Avoid potential access of invalid memory in lock_class")
> > > 248efb2158f1 ("locking/lockdep: Rework lockdep_lock")
> > > 10476e630422 ("locking/lockdep: Fix bad recursion pattern")
> > > 25016bd7f4ca ("locking/lockdep: Avoid recursion in lockdep_count_{for,back}ward_deps()")
> > > 
> > > thanks,
> > > 
> > > greg k-h
> > 
> > These 3 commits are the actual dependencies:
> > 
> > [1] 61cc4534b655 ("locking/lockdep: Avoid potential access of invalid memory in lock_class")
> > [2] 248efb2158f1 ("locking/lockdep: Rework lockdep_lock")
> > [3] 10476e630422 ("locking/lockdep: Fix bad recursion pattern")
> > 
> > It seems to me that [1] and [3] are fixes we would also want in 5.4.
> > Possibly also [2] just to make the cherry-picks cleaner. If there are no
> > objections I can send a patchset for linux-5.4.y with all 4?
> 
> SGTM!

OK, I've sent the patches here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241012232244.2768048-1-cmllamas@xxxxxxxxxx/

Cheers,
Carlos Llamas




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux