On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 9:06 AM Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2024-10-10 at 18:18 -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
> > There is a race between laundromat handling of revoked delegations
> > and a client sending free_stateid operation. Laundromat thread
> > finds that delegation has expired and needs to be revoked so it
> > marks the delegation stid revoked and it puts it on a reaper list
> > but then it unlock the state lock and the actual delegation revocation
> > happens without the lock. Once the stid is marked revoked a racing
> > free_stateid processing thread does the following (1) it calls
> > list_del_init() which removes it from the reaper list and (2) frees
> > the delegation stid structure. The laundromat thread ends up not
> > calling the revoke_delegation() function for this particular delegation
> > but that means it will no release the lock lease that exists on
> > the file.
> >
> > Now, a new open for this file comes in and ends up finding that
> > lease list isn't empty and calls nfsd_breaker_owns_lease() which ends
> > up trying to derefence a freed delegation stateid. Leading to the
> > followint use-after-free KASAN warning:
> >
> > kernel: ==================================================================
> > kernel: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in nfsd_breaker_owns_lease+0x140/0x160 [nfsd]
> > kernel: Read of size 8 at addr ffff0000e73cd0c8 by task nfsd/6205
> > kernel:
> > kernel: CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 6205 Comm: nfsd Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.11.0-rc7+ #9
> > kernel: Hardware name: Apple Inc. Apple Virtualization Generic Platform, BIOS 2069.0.0.0.0 08/03/2024
> > kernel: Call trace:
> > kernel: dump_backtrace+0x98/0x120
> > kernel: show_stack+0x1c/0x30
> > kernel: dump_stack_lvl+0x80/0xe8
> > kernel: print_address_description.constprop.0+0x84/0x390
> > kernel: print_report+0xa4/0x268
> > kernel: kasan_report+0xb4/0xf8
> > kernel: __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x1c/0x28
> > kernel: nfsd_breaker_owns_lease+0x140/0x160 [nfsd]
> > kernel: leases_conflict+0x68/0x370
> > kernel: __break_lease+0x204/0xc38
> > kernel: nfsd_open_break_lease+0x8c/0xf0 [nfsd]
> > kernel: nfsd_file_do_acquire+0xb3c/0x11d0 [nfsd]
> > kernel: nfsd_file_acquire_opened+0x84/0x110 [nfsd]
> > kernel: nfs4_get_vfs_file+0x634/0x958 [nfsd]
> > kernel: nfsd4_process_open2+0xa40/0x1a40 [nfsd]
> > kernel: nfsd4_open+0xa08/0xe80 [nfsd]
> > kernel: nfsd4_proc_compound+0xb8c/0x2130 [nfsd]
> > kernel: nfsd_dispatch+0x22c/0x718 [nfsd]
> > kernel: svc_process_common+0x8e8/0x1960 [sunrpc]
> > kernel: svc_process+0x3d4/0x7e0 [sunrpc]
> > kernel: svc_handle_xprt+0x828/0xe10 [sunrpc]
> > kernel: svc_recv+0x2cc/0x6a8 [sunrpc]
> > kernel: nfsd+0x270/0x400 [nfsd]
> > kernel: kthread+0x288/0x310
> > kernel: ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> >
> > Proposing to have laundromat thread hold the state_lock over both
> > marking thru revoking the delegation as well as making free_stateid
> > acquire state_lock before accessing the list. Making sure that
> > revoke_delegation() (ie kernel_setlease(unlock)) is called for
> > every delegation that was revoked and added to the reaper list.
> >
>
> Nice detective work!
>
> > CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > --- I can't figure out the Fixes: tag. Laundromat's behaviour has
> > been like that forever. But the free_stateid bits wont apply before
> > the 1e3577a4521e ("SUNRPC: discard sv_refcnt, and svc_get/svc_put").
> > But we used that fixes tag already with a previous fix for a different
> > problem.
> > ---
> > fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > index 9c2b1d251ab3..c97907d7fb38 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > @@ -6605,13 +6605,13 @@ nfs4_laundromat(struct nfsd_net *nn)
> > unhash_delegation_locked(dp, SC_STATUS_REVOKED);
> > list_add(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &reaplist);
> > }
> > - spin_unlock(&state_lock);
> > while (!list_empty(&reaplist)) {
> > dp = list_first_entry(&reaplist, struct nfs4_delegation,
> > dl_recall_lru);
> > list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
> > revoke_delegation(dp);
> > }
> > + spin_unlock(&state_lock);
> >
> > spin_lock(&nn->client_lock);
> > while (!list_empty(&nn->close_lru)) {
> > @@ -7213,7 +7213,9 @@ nfsd4_free_stateid(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
> > if (s->sc_status & SC_STATUS_REVOKED) {
> > spin_unlock(&s->sc_lock);
> > dp = delegstateid(s);
> > + spin_lock(&state_lock);
> > list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
> > + spin_unlock(&state_lock);
> > spin_unlock(&cl->cl_lock);
> > nfs4_put_stid(s);
> > ret = nfs_ok;
>
>
> I'm not thrilled with this patch, but it does seem like it would fix
> the problem. Long term, I think we need to get rid of the state_lock,
> but I don't have a real plan for that just yet as it's not 100% clear
> what it still protects.
I wasn't thrilled with the patch either but I couldn't think of
something else so I thought to see what others think.
My apologies, I also realized that when I tried to make sure I
submitted the patch against the latest code I did this against
nfsd-next not nfsd-fixes. There should have been that line with
changed sc_status to LOCKED. Again, doesn't change the fix, just what
this patch was applied to before sending it...
I'll send out a v2 but also try to test what Trond suggest by doing
locking differently.
>
> As far as a Fixes tag, this bug is likely very old. I'd say it probably
> got introduced here:
>
> 2d4a532d385f nfsd: ensure that clp->cl_revoked list is protected by clp->cl_lock
>
> In any case, let's go with this patch until we can come up with a
> better plan for delegation handling.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
