[PATCH 6.10 421/482] cpufreq: Avoid a bad reference count on CPU node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



6.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@xxxxxxxxx>

commit c0f02536fffbbec71aced36d52a765f8c4493dc2 upstream.

In the parse_perf_domain function, if the call to
of_parse_phandle_with_args returns an error, then the reference to the
CPU device node that was acquired at the start of the function would not
be properly decremented.

Address this by declaring the variable with the __free(device_node)
cleanup attribute.

Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mikisabate@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240917134246.584026-1-mikisabate@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: All applicable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/cpufreq.h |    6 +-----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -1113,10 +1113,9 @@ static inline int parse_perf_domain(int
 				    const char *cell_name,
 				    struct of_phandle_args *args)
 {
-	struct device_node *cpu_np;
 	int ret;
 
-	cpu_np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
+	struct device_node *cpu_np __free(device_node) = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
 	if (!cpu_np)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
@@ -1124,9 +1123,6 @@ static inline int parse_perf_domain(int
 					 args);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
-
-	of_node_put(cpu_np);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux