Re: [PATCH RFC 6.6.y 12/15] platform/x86: think-lmi: Fix password opcode ordering for workstations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Vegard,

On Wed, Oct 2, 2024, at 11:12 AM, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> From: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> [ Upstream commit 6f7d0f5fd8e440c3446560100ac4ff9a55eec340 ]
>
> The Lenovo workstations require the password opcode to be run before
> the attribute value is changed (if Admin password is enabled).
>
> Tested on some Thinkpads to confirm they are OK with this order too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@xxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 640a5fa50a42 ("platform/x86: think-lmi: Opcode support")
> Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Link: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240209152359.528919-1-mpearson-lenovo@xxxxxxxxx
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
> (cherry picked from commit 6f7d0f5fd8e440c3446560100ac4ff9a55eec340)
> [Harshit: CVE-2024-26836; Resolve conflicts due to missing commit:
>  318d97849fc2 ("platform/x86: think-lmi: Add bulk save feature") which 
> is
>  not in 6.6.y]
> Signed-off-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c | 16 +++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> index aee869769843f..2396decdb3cb3 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> @@ -1021,7 +1021,16 @@ static ssize_t current_value_store(struct kobject *kobj,
>  		 * Note - this sets the variable and then the password as separate
>  		 * WMI calls. Function tlmi_save_bios_settings will error if the
>  		 * password is incorrect.
> +		 * Workstation's require the opcode to be set before changing the
> +		 * attribute.
>  		 */
> +		if (tlmi_priv.pwd_admin->valid && tlmi_priv.pwd_admin->password[0]) {
> +			ret = tlmi_opcode_setting("WmiOpcodePasswordAdmin",
> +						  tlmi_priv.pwd_admin->password);
> +			if (ret)
> +				goto out;
> +		}
> +
>  		set_str = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s,%s;", setting->display_name,
>  				    new_setting);
>  		if (!set_str) {
> @@ -1033,13 +1042,6 @@ static ssize_t current_value_store(struct kobject *kobj,
>  		if (ret)
>  			goto out;
> 
> -		if (tlmi_priv.pwd_admin->valid && tlmi_priv.pwd_admin->password[0]) {
> -			ret = tlmi_opcode_setting("WmiOpcodePasswordAdmin",
> -						  tlmi_priv.pwd_admin->password);
> -			if (ret)
> -				goto out;
> -		}
> -
>  		ret = tlmi_save_bios_settings("");
>  	} else { /* old non-opcode based authentication method (deprecated) */
>  		if (tlmi_priv.pwd_admin->valid && tlmi_priv.pwd_admin->password[0]) {
> -- 
> 2.34.1

Changes look good. Thank you.

However, not sure why this got caught up in a thread about CVE's? It's fixing functionality that wasn't working on some Lenovo Thinkstation platforms, but isn't a security issue in my opinion. Before the fix you just couldn't use WMI to set BIOS attributes on a few platforms - updates would be rejected.

I can see it might be nice to have in older kernels for some users though. If you need anything else let me know.

Reviewed-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@xxxxxxxxx>

Mark





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux