6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> commit efbc6bd090f48ccf64f7a8dd5daea775821d57ec upstream. The warning Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst:31: ERROR: Unexpected indentation. is caused by incorrectly treating a line as the continuation of a paragraph, rather than as the first line in a bullet list. Fixed: 44d174596260 ("KVM: Use dedicated mutex to protect kvm_usage_count to avoid deadlock") Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ The acquisition orders for mutexes are a must not take either kvm->slots_lock or kvm->slots_arch_lock. cpus_read_lock() vs kvm_lock: + - Taking cpus_read_lock() outside of kvm_lock is problematic, despite that being the official ordering, as it is quite easy to unknowingly trigger cpus_read_lock() while holding kvm_lock. Use caution when walking vm_list,