6.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
commit 77b0b98bb743f5d04d8f995ba1936e1143689d4a upstream.
In commit 75258f20fb70 ("btrfs: subpage: dump extra subpage bitmaps for
debug") an internal macro GET_SUBPAGE_BITMAP() is introduced to grab the
bitmap of each attribute.
But that commit is using bitmap_cut() which will do the left shift of
the larger bitmap, causing incorrect values.
Thankfully this bitmap_cut() is only called for debug usage, and so far
it's not yet causing problem.
Fix it to use bitmap_read() to only grab the desired sub-bitmap.
Fixes: 75258f20fb70 ("btrfs: subpage: dump extra subpage bitmaps for debug")
CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 6.6+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/subpage.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/subpage.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/subpage.c
@@ -766,8 +766,14 @@ void btrfs_folio_unlock_writer(struct bt
}
#define GET_SUBPAGE_BITMAP(subpage, subpage_info, name, dst) \
- bitmap_cut(dst, subpage->bitmaps, 0, \
- subpage_info->name##_offset, subpage_info->bitmap_nr_bits)
+{ \
+ const int bitmap_nr_bits = subpage_info->bitmap_nr_bits; \
+ \
+ ASSERT(bitmap_nr_bits < BITS_PER_LONG); \
+ *dst = bitmap_read(subpage->bitmaps, \
+ subpage_info->name##_offset, \
+ bitmap_nr_bits); \
+}
void __cold btrfs_subpage_dump_bitmap(const struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
struct folio *folio, u64 start, u32 len)
