6.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit f06ae6194f278444201e0b041a00192d794f83b6 ] Add support for __regex and __regex_unpriv macros to check the test execution output against a regular expression. This is similar to __msg and __msg_unpriv, however those expect do substring matching. Signed-off-by: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240617141458.471620-2-cupertino.miranda@xxxxxxxxxx Stable-dep-of: f00bb757ed63 ("selftests/bpf: fix to avoid __msg tag de-duplication by clang") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h | 11 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c | 115 ++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h index fb2f5513e29e1..c0280bd2f340d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h @@ -7,9 +7,9 @@ * * The test_loader sequentially loads each program in a skeleton. * Programs could be loaded in privileged and unprivileged modes. - * - __success, __failure, __msg imply privileged mode; - * - __success_unpriv, __failure_unpriv, __msg_unpriv imply - * unprivileged mode. + * - __success, __failure, __msg, __regex imply privileged mode; + * - __success_unpriv, __failure_unpriv, __msg_unpriv, __regex_unpriv + * imply unprivileged mode. * If combination of privileged and unprivileged attributes is present * both modes are used. If none are present privileged mode is implied. * @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ * Multiple __msg attributes could be specified. * __msg_unpriv Same as __msg but for unprivileged mode. * + * __regex Same as __msg, but using a regular expression. + * __regex_unpriv Same as __msg_unpriv but using a regular expression. + * * __success Expect program load success in privileged mode. * __success_unpriv Expect program load success in unprivileged mode. * @@ -59,10 +62,12 @@ * __auxiliary_unpriv Same, but load program in unprivileged mode. */ #define __msg(msg) __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_msg=" msg))) +#define __regex(regex) __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_regex=" regex))) #define __failure __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_failure"))) #define __success __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_success"))) #define __description(desc) __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_description=" desc))) #define __msg_unpriv(msg) __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_msg_unpriv=" msg))) +#define __regex_unpriv(regex) __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_regex_unpriv=" regex))) #define __failure_unpriv __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_failure_unpriv"))) #define __success_unpriv __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_success_unpriv"))) #define __log_level(lvl) __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_log_level="#lvl))) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c index 524c38e9cde48..f14e10b0de96e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ /* Copyright (c) 2022 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */ #include <linux/capability.h> #include <stdlib.h> +#include <regex.h> #include <test_progs.h> #include <bpf/btf.h> @@ -17,9 +18,11 @@ #define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_FAILURE "comment:test_expect_failure" #define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_SUCCESS "comment:test_expect_success" #define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_MSG_PFX "comment:test_expect_msg=" +#define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_REGEX_PFX "comment:test_expect_regex=" #define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_FAILURE_UNPRIV "comment:test_expect_failure_unpriv" #define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_SUCCESS_UNPRIV "comment:test_expect_success_unpriv" #define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_MSG_PFX_UNPRIV "comment:test_expect_msg_unpriv=" +#define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_REGEX_PFX_UNPRIV "comment:test_expect_regex_unpriv=" #define TEST_TAG_LOG_LEVEL_PFX "comment:test_log_level=" #define TEST_TAG_PROG_FLAGS_PFX "comment:test_prog_flags=" #define TEST_TAG_DESCRIPTION_PFX "comment:test_description=" @@ -46,10 +49,16 @@ enum mode { UNPRIV = 2 }; +struct expect_msg { + const char *substr; /* substring match */ + const char *regex_str; /* regex-based match */ + regex_t regex; +}; + struct test_subspec { char *name; bool expect_failure; - const char **expect_msgs; + struct expect_msg *expect_msgs; size_t expect_msg_cnt; int retval; bool execute; @@ -89,6 +98,16 @@ void test_loader_fini(struct test_loader *tester) static void free_test_spec(struct test_spec *spec) { + int i; + + /* Deallocate expect_msgs arrays. */ + for (i = 0; i < spec->priv.expect_msg_cnt; i++) + if (spec->priv.expect_msgs[i].regex_str) + regfree(&spec->priv.expect_msgs[i].regex); + for (i = 0; i < spec->unpriv.expect_msg_cnt; i++) + if (spec->unpriv.expect_msgs[i].regex_str) + regfree(&spec->unpriv.expect_msgs[i].regex); + free(spec->priv.name); free(spec->unpriv.name); free(spec->priv.expect_msgs); @@ -100,18 +119,38 @@ static void free_test_spec(struct test_spec *spec) spec->unpriv.expect_msgs = NULL; } -static int push_msg(const char *msg, struct test_subspec *subspec) +static int push_msg(const char *substr, const char *regex_str, struct test_subspec *subspec) { void *tmp; + int regcomp_res; + char error_msg[100]; + struct expect_msg *msg; - tmp = realloc(subspec->expect_msgs, (1 + subspec->expect_msg_cnt) * sizeof(void *)); + tmp = realloc(subspec->expect_msgs, + (1 + subspec->expect_msg_cnt) * sizeof(struct expect_msg)); if (!tmp) { ASSERT_FAIL("failed to realloc memory for messages\n"); return -ENOMEM; } subspec->expect_msgs = tmp; - subspec->expect_msgs[subspec->expect_msg_cnt++] = msg; + msg = &subspec->expect_msgs[subspec->expect_msg_cnt]; + + if (substr) { + msg->substr = substr; + msg->regex_str = NULL; + } else { + msg->regex_str = regex_str; + msg->substr = NULL; + regcomp_res = regcomp(&msg->regex, regex_str, REG_EXTENDED|REG_NEWLINE); + if (regcomp_res != 0) { + regerror(regcomp_res, &msg->regex, error_msg, sizeof(error_msg)); + PRINT_FAIL("Regexp compilation error in '%s': '%s'\n", + regex_str, error_msg); + return -EINVAL; + } + } + subspec->expect_msg_cnt += 1; return 0; } @@ -233,13 +272,25 @@ static int parse_test_spec(struct test_loader *tester, spec->mode_mask |= UNPRIV; } else if (str_has_pfx(s, TEST_TAG_EXPECT_MSG_PFX)) { msg = s + sizeof(TEST_TAG_EXPECT_MSG_PFX) - 1; - err = push_msg(msg, &spec->priv); + err = push_msg(msg, NULL, &spec->priv); if (err) goto cleanup; spec->mode_mask |= PRIV; } else if (str_has_pfx(s, TEST_TAG_EXPECT_MSG_PFX_UNPRIV)) { msg = s + sizeof(TEST_TAG_EXPECT_MSG_PFX_UNPRIV) - 1; - err = push_msg(msg, &spec->unpriv); + err = push_msg(msg, NULL, &spec->unpriv); + if (err) + goto cleanup; + spec->mode_mask |= UNPRIV; + } else if (str_has_pfx(s, TEST_TAG_EXPECT_REGEX_PFX)) { + msg = s + sizeof(TEST_TAG_EXPECT_REGEX_PFX) - 1; + err = push_msg(NULL, msg, &spec->priv); + if (err) + goto cleanup; + spec->mode_mask |= PRIV; + } else if (str_has_pfx(s, TEST_TAG_EXPECT_REGEX_PFX_UNPRIV)) { + msg = s + sizeof(TEST_TAG_EXPECT_REGEX_PFX_UNPRIV) - 1; + err = push_msg(NULL, msg, &spec->unpriv); if (err) goto cleanup; spec->mode_mask |= UNPRIV; @@ -337,16 +388,13 @@ static int parse_test_spec(struct test_loader *tester, } if (!spec->unpriv.expect_msgs) { - size_t sz = spec->priv.expect_msg_cnt * sizeof(void *); + for (i = 0; i < spec->priv.expect_msg_cnt; i++) { + struct expect_msg *msg = &spec->priv.expect_msgs[i]; - spec->unpriv.expect_msgs = malloc(sz); - if (!spec->unpriv.expect_msgs) { - PRINT_FAIL("failed to allocate memory for unpriv.expect_msgs\n"); - err = -ENOMEM; - goto cleanup; + err = push_msg(msg->substr, msg->regex_str, &spec->unpriv); + if (err) + goto cleanup; } - memcpy(spec->unpriv.expect_msgs, spec->priv.expect_msgs, sz); - spec->unpriv.expect_msg_cnt = spec->priv.expect_msg_cnt; } } @@ -402,27 +450,40 @@ static void validate_case(struct test_loader *tester, struct bpf_program *prog, int load_err) { - int i, j; + int i, j, err; + char *match; + regmatch_t reg_match[1]; for (i = 0; i < subspec->expect_msg_cnt; i++) { - char *match; - const char *expect_msg; - - expect_msg = subspec->expect_msgs[i]; + struct expect_msg *msg = &subspec->expect_msgs[i]; + + if (msg->substr) { + match = strstr(tester->log_buf + tester->next_match_pos, msg->substr); + if (match) + tester->next_match_pos = match - tester->log_buf + strlen(msg->substr); + } else { + err = regexec(&msg->regex, + tester->log_buf + tester->next_match_pos, 1, reg_match, 0); + if (err == 0) { + match = tester->log_buf + tester->next_match_pos + reg_match[0].rm_so; + tester->next_match_pos += reg_match[0].rm_eo; + } else { + match = NULL; + } + } - match = strstr(tester->log_buf + tester->next_match_pos, expect_msg); if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(match, "expect_msg")) { - /* if we are in verbose mode, we've already emitted log */ if (env.verbosity == VERBOSE_NONE) emit_verifier_log(tester->log_buf, true /*force*/); - for (j = 0; j < i; j++) - fprintf(stderr, - "MATCHED MSG: '%s'\n", subspec->expect_msgs[j]); - fprintf(stderr, "EXPECTED MSG: '%s'\n", expect_msg); + for (j = 0; j <= i; j++) { + msg = &subspec->expect_msgs[j]; + fprintf(stderr, "%s %s: '%s'\n", + j < i ? "MATCHED " : "EXPECTED", + msg->substr ? "SUBSTR" : " REGEX", + msg->substr ?: msg->regex_str); + } return; } - - tester->next_match_pos = match - tester->log_buf + strlen(expect_msg); } } -- 2.43.0
