6.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Howard Hsu <howard-yh.hsu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 9ca65757f0a5b393a7737d37f377d5daf91716af ]
If a VIF acts as a beamformer, it should check peer's beamformee
capability, and vice versa.
Fixes: ba01944adee9 ("wifi: mt76: mt7996: add EHT beamforming support")
Signed-off-by: Howard Hsu <howard-yh.hsu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Shayne Chen <shayne.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240816094635.2391-7-shayne.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/mcu.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/mcu.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/mcu.c
index 7220bcee6fae9..656199161e591 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/mcu.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/mcu.c
@@ -1429,10 +1429,10 @@ mt7996_is_ebf_supported(struct mt7996_phy *phy, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
if (bfee)
return vif->bss_conf.eht_su_beamformee &&
- EHT_PHY(CAP0_SU_BEAMFORMEE, pe->phy_cap_info[0]);
+ EHT_PHY(CAP0_SU_BEAMFORMER, pe->phy_cap_info[0]);
else
return vif->bss_conf.eht_su_beamformer &&
- EHT_PHY(CAP0_SU_BEAMFORMER, pe->phy_cap_info[0]);
+ EHT_PHY(CAP0_SU_BEAMFORMEE, pe->phy_cap_info[0]);
}
if (sta->deflink.he_cap.has_he) {
--
2.43.0
