[PATCH 6.11 207/695] scsi: sd: Dont check if a write for REQ_ATOMIC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



6.11-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 0c150b30d3d51a8c2e09fadd004a640fa12985c6 ]

Flag REQ_ATOMIC can only be set for writes, so don't check if the operation
is also a write in sd_setup_read_write_cmnd().

Fixes: bf4ae8f2e640 ("scsi: sd: Atomic write support")
Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240805113315.1048591-2-john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx
Reviewed-by: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/scsi/sd.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index 9db86943d04cf..76f488ef6a7ee 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -1382,7 +1382,7 @@ static blk_status_t sd_setup_read_write_cmnd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
 	if (protect && sdkp->protection_type == T10_PI_TYPE2_PROTECTION) {
 		ret = sd_setup_rw32_cmnd(cmd, write, lba, nr_blocks,
 					 protect | fua, dld);
-	} else if (rq->cmd_flags & REQ_ATOMIC && write) {
+	} else if (rq->cmd_flags & REQ_ATOMIC) {
 		ret = sd_setup_atomic_cmnd(cmd, lba, nr_blocks,
 				sdkp->use_atomic_write_boundary,
 				protect | fua);
-- 
2.43.0







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux