On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 02:18:20AM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@xxxxxxxxxx> > > This reverts commit 504fc6f4f7f681d2a03aa5f68aad549d90eab853. > > dev_queue_xmit_nit is expected to be called with BH disabled. > __dev_queue_xmit has the following: > > /* Disable soft irqs for various locks below. Also > * stops preemption for RCU. > */ > rcu_read_lock_bh(); > > VRF must follow this invariant. The referenced commit removed this > protection. Which triggered a lockdep warning: [...] > > Fixes: 504fc6f4f7f6 ("vrf: Remove unnecessary RCU-bh critical section") > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240925185216.1990381-1-greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > Reported-by: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@xxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks Willem! The reason my script from 504fc6f4f7f6 did not trigger the problem is that it was pinging the address inside the VRF, so vrf_finish_direct() was only called from the Rx path. If you ping the address outside of the VRF: ping -I vrf1 -i 0.1 -c 10 -q 192.0.2.1 Then vrf_finish_direct() is called from process context and the lockdep warning is triggered. Tested that it does not trigger after applying the revert.