Re: [PATCH net] vrf: revert "vrf: Remove unnecessary RCU-bh critical section"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 02:18:20AM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This reverts commit 504fc6f4f7f681d2a03aa5f68aad549d90eab853.
> 
> dev_queue_xmit_nit is expected to be called with BH disabled.
> __dev_queue_xmit has the following:
> 
>         /* Disable soft irqs for various locks below. Also
>          * stops preemption for RCU.
>          */
>         rcu_read_lock_bh();
> 
> VRF must follow this invariant. The referenced commit removed this
> protection. Which triggered a lockdep warning:

[...]

> 
> Fixes: 504fc6f4f7f6 ("vrf: Remove unnecessary RCU-bh critical section")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240925185216.1990381-1-greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> Reported-by: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks Willem!

The reason my script from 504fc6f4f7f6 did not trigger the problem is
that it was pinging the address inside the VRF, so vrf_finish_direct()
was only called from the Rx path.

If you ping the address outside of the VRF:

ping -I vrf1 -i 0.1 -c 10 -q 192.0.2.1

Then vrf_finish_direct() is called from process context and the lockdep
warning is triggered. Tested that it does not trigger after applying the
revert.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux