On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 04:41:03PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote: > @@ -2251,7 +2261,16 @@ static void enetc_disable_txbdr(struct enetc_hw *hw, struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring) > enetc_txbdr_wr(hw, idx, ENETC_TBMR, 0); > } > > -static void enetc_disable_bdrs(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv) > +static void enetc_disable_rx_bdrs(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv) > +{ > + struct enetc_hw *hw = &priv->si->hw; > + int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rx_rings; i++) > + enetc_disable_rxbdr(hw, priv->rx_ring[i]); > +} > + > +static void enetc_disable_tx_bdrs(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv) > { > struct enetc_hw *hw = &priv->si->hw; > int i; > @@ -2259,8 +2278,6 @@ static void enetc_disable_bdrs(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv) > for (i = 0; i < priv->num_tx_rings; i++) > enetc_disable_txbdr(hw, priv->tx_ring[i]); > Please do not leave a blank line here. In the git tree after applying this patch, that blank line appears at the end of enetc_disable_tx_bdrs(). > - for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rx_rings; i++) > - enetc_disable_rxbdr(hw, priv->rx_ring[i]); > }